<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CPRE Surrey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 12:33:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mole Valley Council&#8217;s golf course vote &#8220;sets a dangerous precedent&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=596</link>
		<comments>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=596#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 22:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cpre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CPRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hands off the Green Belt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife and Nature Conservation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CPRE Surrey Branch has expressed &#8220;disappointment and alarm&#8221; at the vote by Mole Valley District Council&#8217;s Development Control Committee to allow the development of a golf and leisure complex at Cherkley Court, Leatherhead, the former home of Lord Beaverbrook. During the 2-hour debate at the Committee&#8217;s meeting on May 2, a succession of Councillors had [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=596</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Threats to Surrey countryside are highlighted at campaign meeting</title>
		<link>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=591</link>
		<comments>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=591#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cpre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airport Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatwick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hands off the Green Belt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mineral Extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surrey&#8217;s countryside is under threat from new waves of housebuilding, airport expansion and mineral extraction &#8211; despite the Government&#8217;s assurances about safeguarding the Green Belt. This was the message for members of CPRE Surrey at their annual meeting on 27 April held at the Abraham Dixon Hall in Leatherhead. Speakers at the meeting highlighted the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=591</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPRE takes optimistic view of Surrey&#8217;s future</title>
		<link>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=585</link>
		<comments>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=585#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 11:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cpre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CPRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over 200 members of CPRE Surrey attended Members&#8217; Forums over the last two weekends. &#160; The CPRE Surrey Members&#8217; Forums were held at Shalford Village Hall (for members in the west of the county) and Reigate Town Hall (for members in the east). &#160; At both Forums the message was distinctly upbeat. Tim Murphy, Chairman [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=585</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enthusiastic backing for Surrey Hills AONB boundary review</title>
		<link>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=582</link>
		<comments>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=582#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cpre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CPRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife and Nature Conservation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Members of the Surrey Branch of CPRE have thrown their weight behind Natural England’s decision to review the boundaries of the county’s Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). &#160; Tim Harrold, Vice-President of CPRE Surrey, told a packed meeting of CPRE members that this preliminary review represented “a wonderful opportunity to strengthen the protection afforded [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=582</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Campaigners welcome first steps towards enlargement of AONB</title>
		<link>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=578</link>
		<comments>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=578#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cpre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CPRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife and Nature Conservation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Surrey Branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) has welcomed the prospect of a widening of the boundaries of the Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) which would bring more of Surrey ’s countryside within the protected area. &#160; Natural England , the official body that advises the Government on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=578</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local Government Minister &#8220;sadly misled&#8221; about CPRE and planning</title>
		<link>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=563</link>
		<comments>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=563#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cpre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CPRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CPRE Surrey Branch Chairman Tim Murphy writes to Bob Neill MP:
"Planning needs to 'hold the ring' between economic, social and environmental considerations. You are, presumably, aware of the history of planning in the UK which has given us a system of regulation that is widely admired around the world. Planning is not, and should never be, designed to simply advance a development agenda. It isn't planning controls that have caused our current economic problems but bankers and, indeed, the lack of regulation in the financial sector."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=563</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Belt threatened as rules change looms</title>
		<link>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=549</link>
		<comments>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=549#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 10:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cpre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hands off the Green Belt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Countryside campaigners have been dealt a double blow after it emerged that one in three Green Belt planning applications is approved. Mole Valley District Council (MVDC) approved 329 out of 979 applications in the Green Belt in 2010/11, similar to the previous year, when 391 out of 926 were permitted. The figures, obtained by the Leatherhead Advertiser after a request made under the Freedom of Information Act, come weeks after the Government announced a "simplification" of planning rules, which conservation groups claim will allow widespread building on the Green Belt.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=549</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fight back against fly-tipping!</title>
		<link>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=540</link>
		<comments>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=540#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cpre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CPRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fly-tipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fly-tipping and littering is ruining our countryside and harming the wildlife. Surrey is blessed with some of the best countryside the country has to offer but it is being blighted by rubbish dumped in hedgerows, lanes and fields. Action needs to be taken now to stop the countryside becoming a rubbish dump. 

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=540</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local countryside charity rejects Minister&#8217;s criticism</title>
		<link>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=534</link>
		<comments>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=534#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cpre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CPRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hands off the Green Belt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Surrey Branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England has hit back at Tory Minister Bob Neill after he branded CPRE a left-wing front. Branch Director Andy Smith said that the Minister was "very wide of the mark indeed" when he accused CPRE and the National Trust of being motivated by a left-wing political agenda.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=534</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alarm over Government&#8217;s planning shake-up</title>
		<link>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=537</link>
		<comments>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=537#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cpre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CPRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hands off the Green Belt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?p=537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Local countryside campaigners are warning that the Government's proposals for planning reform could pose the biggest threat to Surrey's countryside in generations. The Government's draft National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) represents the biggest shake-up of planning for over 50 years and CPRE believes it will place the countryside under increasing threat as the economy recovers.


]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cpresurrey.org.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=537</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

